Cyber Security
Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Are Becoming a Growing Concern
Radu Balanescu, the Associate Director for Cybersecurity at BCG, and Shoaib Yousuf, the Managing Director and Partner at BCG speak about cybersecurity for critical infrastructure, the threat landscape, trends in cyberattacks, and more
Why is cybersecurity highly relevant for critical infrastructure and its operators in the MEA region, and particularly now?
Critical National Infrastructure (CNI) operators in the MEA region face a dual responsibility: protecting shareholder interests while ensuring national security and stability. Their role extends beyond operational resilience to actively strengthening the country’s cyber defense through industry collaboration, intelligence sharing, R&D, and workforce development. Unlike conventional organizations, CNIs are prime targets for a broad spectrum of threat actors.
The consequences of cyberattacks go beyond economic and reputational damage, threatening national security by destabilizing critical sectors such as energy, financial markets, and healthcare. With rising geopolitical tensions amplifying both the frequency and sophistication of attacks, CNIs must take a leading stance in fortifying cybersecurity to mitigate disruptions that could have far-reaching implications.
Can you provide an overview of the current cybersecurity landscape for critical infrastructure in the MEA region?
The interconnected nature of critical infrastructure means that a weakness in one part of the supply chain can expose the entire ecosystem to cyber threats. The cybersecurity landscape for CNIs in the MEA region is shaped by sector-specific challenges across industries such as energy, telecommunications, healthcare, financial services, and public services. While each sector has unique vulnerabilities, common challenges persist, including workforce shortages, skills gaps, increasing regulatory pressures, rapid digitization, and heightened supply chain risks.
The global shortfall of 2.8 million cybersecurity professionals has left CNIs struggling to attract and retain talent, with critical positions such as cybersecurity leadership, architecture, and cloud security often remaining unfilled. Addressing this requires sustained investment in workforce development and alternative strategies to bridge expertise gaps.
National cybersecurity authorities are intensifying regulatory pressure by implementing sector-specific frameworks to strengthen cyber resilience. While foundational policies such as the ECC in KSA and Qatar’s Cyber Security Framework of 2022 provide a compliance baseline, additional regulations focusing on OT security, third-party risk management, and cloud governance are expected.
CNIs that operate internationally must also comply with overlapping regional and global requirements, adding complexity to their cybersecurity obligations. Meanwhile, rapid digitization is further expanding the attack surface. Financial institutions are focusing on digital customer touchpoints, while energy companies are integrating IT and OT environments—introducing new threats into previously isolated systems. IT/OT convergence makes cybersecurity not just a technological issue but also a health and safety risk with potentially severe consequences.
Supply chain vulnerabilities are becoming a growing concern, as cybercriminals increasingly exploit third-party vendors and cloud services to enter CNI networks. The interconnected nature of critical infrastructure means that a weakness in one part of the supply chain can expose the entire ecosystem to cyber threats. As attacks become more sophisticated, prioritization of proactive cybersecurity strategies , must be front and center , balancing compliance, workforce development, and digital resilience to safeguard national security and operational stability must be at the core.
What are the most notable trends in cyber attacks targeting these systems?
Several key trends are shaping the cyber threat landscape for CNI, including the commoditization of cyber-attacks, the rise of AI-supported threats, and the growing sophistication of well-funded, highly organized threat groups. The commoditization of cyber-attacks has made malicious activity more accessible and cost-effective than ever. Cybercriminals have become highly structured, operating like corporations, with hacking-as-a-service becoming a viable and increasingly prevalent business model. This has lowered the barrier to entry, enabling a wider range of actors to execute complex attacks.
AI has emerged as a double-edged sword—while it enhances cybersecurity defenses, it also provides attackers with powerful tools for automation, scripting, and deception. AI-assisted attacks allow individuals with limited expertise to carry out cyber intrusions that would have previously required specialized skills. Deepfake phishing, in particular, has surged, leveraging AI to create highly convincing fraudulent content across written, voice, and video formats, increasing the risk of social engineering attacks.
In addition, highly resourced and strategically motivated cyber groups are targeting CNIs to disrupt services, spread disinformation, or steal intellectual property. These adversaries often operate with long-term objectives and access to advanced capabilities, making them some of the most formidable threats to critical infrastructure. With cyber threats evolving in scale and sophistication, CNIs must continuously adapt their security posture to counter these emerging risks effectively.
How important is employee training and awareness in preventing cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure?
Employee training and awareness are fundamental to strengthening cybersecurity defenses for CNI. BCG research on major data breaches indicates that more than two-thirds result from organizational, process, or human failures—not technology—underscoring that people are the true first line of defense against cyber threats. Both structured training and ongoing awareness initiatives are essential to building a resilient security culture within CNIs.
Training equips employees with the necessary skills to identify and respond to cyber threats effectively. Foundational cybersecurity training should be mandatory for all employees, covering basic concepts and common risks. Leadership teams require additional insights into targeted threats such as fraud and impersonation, ensuring they can make informed decisions in high-risk scenarios. For technical personnel, continuous upskilling is critical, as staying ahead of emerging attack vectors can mean the difference between mitigating and succumbing to a breach.
Beyond training, awareness programs play a vital role in reinforcing cybersecurity best practices and fostering vigilance. CNIs implement initiatives such as phishing simulations to sensitize employees to real-world threats and drive behavioral change. At the executive level, cyberattack simulations help leaders assess their crisis response capabilities, ensuring that cybersecurity accountability is embedded at the highest levels of the organization, including the boardroom. Given the evolving threat landscape, investing in both training and awareness is not optional—it is a strategic necessity for safeguarding critical infrastructure.
What role does proactive information sharing play in securing critical infrastructure systems?
Proactive information sharing is a critical enabler of cybersecurity resilience for CNIs, significantly enhancing their ability to detect, prevent, and respond to threats. The sheer scale of incidents that security teams handle—sometimes exceeding a million per week in large CNIs—makes identifying real threats akin to searching for a needle in a haystack. On average, it takes nearly 300 days globally to detect a breach, and even mature organizations still require about 30 days to do so—far too long for a malicious actor to operate undetected within a network. Information sharing transforms one organization’s detection into another’s prevention (as noted by James Scott, co-founder of the Institute for CNI Technology.)
Beyond improving detection, effective information-sharing frameworks drive business value by preventing costly cybersecurity incidents. They help CNIs mitigate financial losses from system downtime, customer attrition, and reputational damage. Furthermore, sharing intelligence strengthens the entire ecosystem, advancing cybersecurity maturity across industries. Critical information exchanged within these networks includes indicators of compromise, best practices for mitigation, and standardized frameworks for secure data-sharing protocols.
Regulators play an essential role in fostering collaboration among CNIs, expanding cyber threat intelligence, and strengthening collective resilience. Their initiatives support defensive capabilities, improve incident response, and encourage secure collaboration while safeguarding data privacy. As cyber threats grow in complexity, CNIs must embrace a cooperative approach—leveraging shared insights to bolster defenses and minimize risk exposure across the sector.
What role do MEA governments play in regulating and enforcing cybersecurity standards for critical infrastructure?
MEA governments are implementing comprehensive cybersecurity regulation and enforcement frameworks for critical infrastructure, responding decisively to an increasingly complex threat landscape. Through empowered national cybersecurity authorities with cross-sector mandates, they are establishing rigorous governance structures that address the interconnected nature of modern cyber risks.
This strategic approach is evidenced by Qatar’s detailed National Cyber Security Strategy 2024-2030 and the UAE’s decisive 2023 Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Policy, which integrates critical infrastructure protection with national security imperatives while ensuring the continuity of essential services vital to economic stability. The MEA region has developed a sophisticated model of regional cybersecurity collaboration, establishing robust mechanisms for threat intelligence sharing and coordinated defense capabilities. Saudi Arabia demonstrates this through its stringent mandatory compliance framework for CNIs, implementing Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC) alongside sector-specific regulations that address emerging technical and operational risks.
This systematic approach extends to building critical security capabilities, as shown by initiatives like Saudi Arabia’s Women Empowerment in Cyberspace (WEC) program, which strengthens the region’s cybersecurity talent base while addressing crucial skill gaps in critical infrastructure protection. These coordinated efforts reflect the MEA governments’ clear understanding that effective critical infrastructure protection requires both strong national frameworks and deep regional cooperation to address evolving cyber threats.
Cyber Security
Positive Technologies Reports 80% of Middle East Cyberattacks Compromise Confidential Data
A new study by cybersecurity firm Positive Technologies has shed light on the evolving cyber threat landscape in the Middle East, revealing that a staggering 80% of successful cyberattacks in the region lead to the breach of confidential information. The research, examining the impact of digital transformation, organized cybercrime, and the underground market, highlights the increasing exposure of Middle Eastern nations to sophisticated cyber threats.
The study found that one in three successful cyberattacks were attributed to Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, which predominantly target government institutions and critical infrastructure. While the rapid adoption of new IT solutions is driving efficiency, it simultaneously expands the attack surface for malicious actors.
Cybercriminals in the region heavily utilize social engineering tactics (61% of cases) and malware (51%), often employing a combination of both. Remote Access Trojans (RATs) emerged as a primary weapon in 27% of malware-based attacks, indicating a common objective of gaining long-term access to compromised systems.
The analysis revealed that credentials and trade secrets (29% each) were the most sought-after data, followed by personal information (20%). This stolen data is frequently leveraged for blackmail or sold on the dark web. Beyond data theft, 38% of attacks resulted in the disruption of core business operations, posing significant risks to critical sectors like healthcare, transportation, and government services.
APT groups are identified as the most formidable threat actors due to their substantial resources and advanced technical capabilities. In 2024, they accounted for 32% of recorded attacks, with a clear focus on government and critical infrastructure. Their activities often extend beyond traditional cybercrime, encompassing cyberespionage and even cyberwarfare aimed at undermining trust and demonstrating digital dominance.
Dark web analysis further revealed that government organizations were the most frequently mentioned targets (34%), followed by the industrial sector (20%). Hacktivist activity was also prominent, with ideologically motivated actors often sharing stolen databases freely, exacerbating the cybercrime landscape.
The United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Qatar, all leaders in digital transformation, were the most frequently cited countries on the dark web in connection with stolen data. Experts suggest that the prevalence of advertisements for selling data from these nations underscores the challenges of securing rapidly expanding digital environments, which cybercriminals are quick to exploit.
Positive Technologies analyst Alexey Lukash said, “In the near future, we expect cyberthreats in the Middle East to grow both in scale and sophistication. As digital transformation efforts expand, so does the attack surface, creating more opportunities for hackers of all skill levels. Governments in the region need to focus on protecting critical infrastructure, financial institutions, and government systems. The consequences of successful attacks in these areas could have far-reaching implications for national security and sovereignty.”
To help organizations build stronger defenses against cyberthreats, Positive Technologies recommends implementing modern security measures. These include vulnerability management systems to automate asset management, as well as identify, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities. Positive Technologies also suggests using network traffic analysis tools to monitor network activity and detect cyberattacks. Another critical layer of protection involves securing applications. Such solutions are designed to identify vulnerabilities in applications, detect suspicious activity, and take immediate action to prevent attacks.
Positive Technologies emphasizes the need for a comprehensive, result-driven approach to cybersecurity. This strategy is designed to prevent attackers from disrupting critical business processes. Scalable and flexible, it can be tailored to individual organizations, entire industries, or even large-scale digital ecosystems like nations or international alliances. The goal is to deliver clear, measurable results in cybersecurity—not just to meet compliance standards or rely on isolated technical fixes.
Cyber Security
Axis Communications Sheds Light on Video Surveillance Industry Perspectives on AI
Axis Communications has published a new report that explores the state of AI in the global video surveillance industry. Titled The State of AI in Video Surveillance, the report examines the key opportunities, challenges and future trends, as well as the responsible practices that are becoming critical for organisations in their use of AI. The report draws insights from qualitative research as well as quantitative data sources, including in-depth interviews with carefully selected experts from the Axis global partner network.
A leading insight featured in the report is the unanimous view among interviewees that interest in the technology has surged over the past few years, with more and more business customers becoming curious and increasingly knowledgeable about its potential applications.

Mats Thulin, Director AI & Analytics Solutions at Axis Communications
“AI is a technology that has the potential to touch every corner and every function of the modern enterprise. That said, any implementations or integrations that aim to drive value come with serious financial and ethical considerations. These considerations should prompt organisations to scrutinise any initiative or investment. Axis’s new report not only shows how AI is transforming the video surveillance landscape, but also how that transformation should ideally be approached,” said Mats Thulin, Director AI & Analytics Solutions at Axis Communications.
According to the Axis report, the move by businesses from on-premise security server systems to hybrid cloud architectures continues at pace, driven by the need for faster processing, improved bandwidth usage and greater scalability. At the same time, cloud-based technology is being combined with edge AI solutions, which play a crucial role by enabling faster, local analytics with minimal latency, a prerequisite for real-time responsiveness in security-related situations.
By moving AI processing closer to the source using edge devices such as cameras, businesses can reduce bandwidth consumption and better support real-time applications like security monitoring. As a result, the hybrid approach is expected to continue to shape the role of AI in security and unlock new business intelligence and operational efficiencies.
A trend that is emerging among businesses is the integration of diverse data for a more comprehensive analysis, transforming safety and security. Experts predict that by integrating additional sensory data, such as audio and contextual environmental factors caught on camera, can lead to enhanced situational awareness and greater actionable insights, offering a more comprehensive understanding of events.
Combining multiple data streams can ultimately lead to improved detection and prediction of potential threats or incidents. For example, in emergency scenarios, pairing visual data with audio analysis can enable security teams to respond more quickly and precisely. This context-aware approach can potentially elevate safety, security and operational efficiency, and reflects how system operators can leverage and process multiple data inputs to make better-informed decisions.
According to the Axis report, interviewees emphasised that responsible AI and ethical considerations are critical priorities in the development and deployment of new systems, raising concerns about decisions potentially based on biased or unreliable AI. Other risks highlighted include those related to privacy violations and how facial and behavioural recognition could have ethical and legal repercussions.
As a result, a recurring theme among interviewees was the importance of embedding responsible AI practices early in the development process. Interviewees also pointed to regulatory frameworks, such as the EU AI Act, as pivotal in shaping responsible use of technology, particularly in high-risk areas. While regulation was broadly acknowledged as necessary to build trust and accountability, several interviewees also stressed the need for balance to safeguard innovation and address privacy and data security concerns.
“The findings of this report reflect how enterprises are viewing the trend of AI holistically, working to have a firm grasp of both how to use the technology effectively and understand the macro implications of its usage. Conversations surrounding privacy and responsibility will continue but so will the pace of innovation and the adoption of technologies that advance the video surveillance industry and lead to new and exciting possibilities,” Thulin added.
Artificial Intelligence
CyberKnight Partners with Ridge Security for AI-Powered Security Validation
The automated penetration testing market was valued at roughly $3.1 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow rapidly, with forecasts estimating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) between 21% and 25%. By 2030, the sector is expected to reach approximately $9 to $10 billion. The broader penetration testing industry is also expanding, with projections indicating it will surpass $5.3 billion by 2027, according to MarketandMarket.
To support enterprises and government entities across the Middle East, Turkey and Africa (META) with identifying and validating vulnerabilities and reducing security gaps in real-time, CyberKnight has partnered with Ridge Security, the World’s First Al-powered Offensive Security Validation Platform. Ridge Security’s products incorporate advanced artificial intelligence to deliver security validation through automated penetration testing and breach and attack simulations.
RidgeBot uses advanced AI to autonomously perform multi-vector iterative attacks, conduct continuous penetration testing, and validate vulnerabilities with zero false positives. RidgeBot has been deployed by customers worldwide as a key element of their journey to evolve from traditional vulnerability management to Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).
“Ridge Security’s core strength lies in delivering holistic, AI-driven security validation that enables organizations to proactively manage risk and improve operational performance,” said Hom Bahmanyar, Chief Enablement Officer at Ridge Security. “We are delighted to partner with CyberKnight to leverage their network of strategic partners, deep-rooted customer relations, and security expertise to accelerate our expansion plans in the region.”
“Our partnership with Ridge Security is a timely and strategic step, as 69% of organizations are now adopting AI-driven security for threat detection and prevention,” added Wael Jaber, Chief Strategy Officer at CyberKnight. “By joining forces, we enhance our ability to deliver automated, intelligent security validation solutions, reaffirming our commitment to empowering customers with resilient, future-ready cybersecurity across the region.”
-
GISEC1 week agoPositive Technologies @ GISEC Global 2025: Demonstrating Cutting-Edge Cyber Threats and AI Defense Strategies
-
Cyber Security1 week agoAxis Communications Sheds Light on Video Surveillance Industry Perspectives on AI
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: SANS Institute Weighs in on Deepfakes, Model Poisoning and Risk Frameworks at GISEC Global 2025
-
GISEC1 week agoManageEngine @ GISEC Global 2025: AI, Quantum Computing, and Ransomware Form Part of Cybersecurity Outlook for 2025
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: SentinelOne Speaks Hyperautomation, Purple AI, and the Future of Threat Detection at GISEC Global 2025
-
Africa Focus6 days agoCyberKnight Sets Up South Africa Entity
-
GISEC1 week agoGroup-IB @ GISEC Global 2025: Tackling Evolving Cyber Threats with Localised Intelligence and AI
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: CyberKnight on Zero Trust, AI, and Saudi Arabia’s Digital Transformation at GISEC Global 2025
