Cyber Security
Security Models Should be Simple to Make Them Easier to Implement
Brian Chappell, Director – Product Management, BeyondTrust, speaks about best-practice standards for data security and compliance
How has the need for data security and compliance changed over the past year?
The move to remote working has radically expanded the arena in which organisations need to address and maintain data security and with that comes greater complexity in satisfying compliance requirements. The number of devices needing securing has grown exponentially while the attack surface has grown geometrically.
Also, more remote workers, often in environments that are far beyond any control of the organisation — i.e., not just home but, as lock down’s ease, coffee shops, etc. — leads to the need to increase controls on the endpoint without, as far as possible, impacting productivity and flexibility. We are looking at unprecedented increases in the challenges to maintaining an effective and appropriate data security practice. Too stringent a control suite and we’ll see a resurgence of shadow IT. Too open, and we risk easy dissemination of sensitive company information and/or easy entry into the environment.
What are the best-practice standards and frameworks that can help companies achieve and maintain data security and compliance?
Frameworks tend to be collections of best practices that commonly address specific industry regulatory requirements — we see many of those best practices repeated across the various frameworks such as NIST Cybersecurity Framework, HIPAA, FISMA, etc.
For me, the most important activity is to focus initially on the basics. I visualise the attack surface like desert sands — constantly shifting with dunes rising up and sinking away. Trying to build anything complex on top of that risks the structure tipping and toppling to the ground at, what might be, the slightest change.
We need to harden our cybersecurity strategy with foundational piles that hold steady and give us a platform on which to build. Those foundational elements include Privileged Password Management, Privileged Elevation and Delegation Management, Privileged Session Management, Vulnerability Management and Identity Management. These are the basics that organisations continue to not get right and, as a result, provide the most common areas of exploit.
Getting these right means focusing on them, working to ensure the security models are simple, which makes them easier to design, implement, manage, maintain and respond to when something bad is happening. By simple, I don’t mean basic, I mean avoiding unnecessary complexity — something that’s very difficult for many in cybersecurity.
As Steve Jobs put it: “Simple can be harder than complex. You have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But it’s worth it in the end because once you get there, you can move mountains.” Get the basics right and the rest gets easier and that’s vital with the additional complexity in today’s data security world.
What according to you are the five tips that companies need to follow to comply with data security regulations?
Tip #1: You cannot abdicate or pass on responsibility for your data to another organisation. Even if you empower them to manage access, implement controls, or provide the infrastructure in which it’s stored and/or processed, it’s your data and you are ultimately responsible for it. That’s a guiding principle that any data security specialist should have pinned to their wall.
Tip #2: Get control over privileged access. This doesn’t mean just lock the environment down but rather implement controls that move you from a restricting approach — i.e., trying to control what someone can do with privilege — and onto an enabling approach where you can explicitly and granularly allow an unprivileged user to do more. It’s so much easier to understand and manage.
Tip #3: With #1 in place, you can know who has access to sensitive data. Next is to control that access through password and session management. This gives you visibility into when they accessed it and what they did with it.
Tip #4: Don’t ignore the external accesses into your environment by vendors supporting their systems in your infrastructure. Bring those accesses under the same controls as your own teams. Avoid VPN access. It doesn’t matter how well you think you have that entry point controlled, it’s likely to provide access to systems that are necessary for that access, but the engineer shouldn’t have visibility to. Find an access technology that doesn’t provide a direct TCP/IP path to the target system(s).
Tip #5: Know the regulations. This seems obvious but everyone involved in data security should read and understand the regulations they need to comply with. Many rely on what others tell them and that’s subject to interpretation. The number of times I hear requirements quoted that I know come from other, often unrelated, regulations, only because that’s what the person has been told or assumed. This is often the result of being asked a question about an area that the regulations applying to the organisation don’t cover, so people coop requirements from other regulations because they ‘make sense’. This complicates the compliance and often results is multiple solutions for the same problem and friction from each and every one. Be compliant, be a little more than compliant but make sure you understand where compliance is and knowingly step over the line — don’t try and ‘control’ your way out of that situation. Sometimes the answer is to remove controls.
Many countries have passed their own version of data protection laws recently. How does your company help its clients with securing their data and staying compliant?
BeyondTrust is focused on the most pivotal, foundational aspect of cybersecurity — Privileged Access Management. It’s impossible to secure data and stay compliant without good controls around privileged access, as access to sensitive data is privileged and compliance is very much focused on ensuring you know who has access to what and when and where and how they exercised those accesses.
Helping customers put together the foundations for their cybersecurity/data security solutions not only addresses the most common mechanisms for data loss but also reduces the noise in the system. There are no longer events that need monitoring around what someone is doing with their privileged account — they don’t have one and we know exactly what they are doing with the accesses they’ve been given, and they cannot do any more than that. So now, those other tools in the system have cleaner signals for when bad things do happen, and the organisation gets more value from them as well.
Do you believe the line between data security and data privacy has started blurring?
I don’t believe there is a line between data security and data privacy. You cannot have data privacy without good, effective, appropriate data security. While the concerns may be different conceptually, data privacy compliance relies on good controls to ensure that only appropriate people have access to data, that we know when they accessed the data and how they used that data. Data privacy also defines controls around how data is processed and for what purposes along with how long it can be retained. But in all aspects of that, the data must be secured to ensure that controls are effective.
Data Security teams may not be concerned with the larger data privacy requirements and regulations, but it would benefit them and their organisations if they became familiar with these, so that they can help ensure the controls stay simple yet appropriate. That will yield better data security as complexity really is a real and present danger in any system.
Cyber Security
Positive Technologies Reports 80% of Middle East Cyberattacks Compromise Confidential Data
A new study by cybersecurity firm Positive Technologies has shed light on the evolving cyber threat landscape in the Middle East, revealing that a staggering 80% of successful cyberattacks in the region lead to the breach of confidential information. The research, examining the impact of digital transformation, organized cybercrime, and the underground market, highlights the increasing exposure of Middle Eastern nations to sophisticated cyber threats.
The study found that one in three successful cyberattacks were attributed to Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, which predominantly target government institutions and critical infrastructure. While the rapid adoption of new IT solutions is driving efficiency, it simultaneously expands the attack surface for malicious actors.
Cybercriminals in the region heavily utilize social engineering tactics (61% of cases) and malware (51%), often employing a combination of both. Remote Access Trojans (RATs) emerged as a primary weapon in 27% of malware-based attacks, indicating a common objective of gaining long-term access to compromised systems.
The analysis revealed that credentials and trade secrets (29% each) were the most sought-after data, followed by personal information (20%). This stolen data is frequently leveraged for blackmail or sold on the dark web. Beyond data theft, 38% of attacks resulted in the disruption of core business operations, posing significant risks to critical sectors like healthcare, transportation, and government services.
APT groups are identified as the most formidable threat actors due to their substantial resources and advanced technical capabilities. In 2024, they accounted for 32% of recorded attacks, with a clear focus on government and critical infrastructure. Their activities often extend beyond traditional cybercrime, encompassing cyberespionage and even cyberwarfare aimed at undermining trust and demonstrating digital dominance.
Dark web analysis further revealed that government organizations were the most frequently mentioned targets (34%), followed by the industrial sector (20%). Hacktivist activity was also prominent, with ideologically motivated actors often sharing stolen databases freely, exacerbating the cybercrime landscape.
The United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Qatar, all leaders in digital transformation, were the most frequently cited countries on the dark web in connection with stolen data. Experts suggest that the prevalence of advertisements for selling data from these nations underscores the challenges of securing rapidly expanding digital environments, which cybercriminals are quick to exploit.
Positive Technologies analyst Alexey Lukash said, “In the near future, we expect cyberthreats in the Middle East to grow both in scale and sophistication. As digital transformation efforts expand, so does the attack surface, creating more opportunities for hackers of all skill levels. Governments in the region need to focus on protecting critical infrastructure, financial institutions, and government systems. The consequences of successful attacks in these areas could have far-reaching implications for national security and sovereignty.”
To help organizations build stronger defenses against cyberthreats, Positive Technologies recommends implementing modern security measures. These include vulnerability management systems to automate asset management, as well as identify, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities. Positive Technologies also suggests using network traffic analysis tools to monitor network activity and detect cyberattacks. Another critical layer of protection involves securing applications. Such solutions are designed to identify vulnerabilities in applications, detect suspicious activity, and take immediate action to prevent attacks.
Positive Technologies emphasizes the need for a comprehensive, result-driven approach to cybersecurity. This strategy is designed to prevent attackers from disrupting critical business processes. Scalable and flexible, it can be tailored to individual organizations, entire industries, or even large-scale digital ecosystems like nations or international alliances. The goal is to deliver clear, measurable results in cybersecurity—not just to meet compliance standards or rely on isolated technical fixes.
Cyber Security
Axis Communications Sheds Light on Video Surveillance Industry Perspectives on AI
Axis Communications has published a new report that explores the state of AI in the global video surveillance industry. Titled The State of AI in Video Surveillance, the report examines the key opportunities, challenges and future trends, as well as the responsible practices that are becoming critical for organisations in their use of AI. The report draws insights from qualitative research as well as quantitative data sources, including in-depth interviews with carefully selected experts from the Axis global partner network.
A leading insight featured in the report is the unanimous view among interviewees that interest in the technology has surged over the past few years, with more and more business customers becoming curious and increasingly knowledgeable about its potential applications.

Mats Thulin, Director AI & Analytics Solutions at Axis Communications
“AI is a technology that has the potential to touch every corner and every function of the modern enterprise. That said, any implementations or integrations that aim to drive value come with serious financial and ethical considerations. These considerations should prompt organisations to scrutinise any initiative or investment. Axis’s new report not only shows how AI is transforming the video surveillance landscape, but also how that transformation should ideally be approached,” said Mats Thulin, Director AI & Analytics Solutions at Axis Communications.
According to the Axis report, the move by businesses from on-premise security server systems to hybrid cloud architectures continues at pace, driven by the need for faster processing, improved bandwidth usage and greater scalability. At the same time, cloud-based technology is being combined with edge AI solutions, which play a crucial role by enabling faster, local analytics with minimal latency, a prerequisite for real-time responsiveness in security-related situations.
By moving AI processing closer to the source using edge devices such as cameras, businesses can reduce bandwidth consumption and better support real-time applications like security monitoring. As a result, the hybrid approach is expected to continue to shape the role of AI in security and unlock new business intelligence and operational efficiencies.
A trend that is emerging among businesses is the integration of diverse data for a more comprehensive analysis, transforming safety and security. Experts predict that by integrating additional sensory data, such as audio and contextual environmental factors caught on camera, can lead to enhanced situational awareness and greater actionable insights, offering a more comprehensive understanding of events.
Combining multiple data streams can ultimately lead to improved detection and prediction of potential threats or incidents. For example, in emergency scenarios, pairing visual data with audio analysis can enable security teams to respond more quickly and precisely. This context-aware approach can potentially elevate safety, security and operational efficiency, and reflects how system operators can leverage and process multiple data inputs to make better-informed decisions.
According to the Axis report, interviewees emphasised that responsible AI and ethical considerations are critical priorities in the development and deployment of new systems, raising concerns about decisions potentially based on biased or unreliable AI. Other risks highlighted include those related to privacy violations and how facial and behavioural recognition could have ethical and legal repercussions.
As a result, a recurring theme among interviewees was the importance of embedding responsible AI practices early in the development process. Interviewees also pointed to regulatory frameworks, such as the EU AI Act, as pivotal in shaping responsible use of technology, particularly in high-risk areas. While regulation was broadly acknowledged as necessary to build trust and accountability, several interviewees also stressed the need for balance to safeguard innovation and address privacy and data security concerns.
“The findings of this report reflect how enterprises are viewing the trend of AI holistically, working to have a firm grasp of both how to use the technology effectively and understand the macro implications of its usage. Conversations surrounding privacy and responsibility will continue but so will the pace of innovation and the adoption of technologies that advance the video surveillance industry and lead to new and exciting possibilities,” Thulin added.
Artificial Intelligence
CyberKnight Partners with Ridge Security for AI-Powered Security Validation
The automated penetration testing market was valued at roughly $3.1 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow rapidly, with forecasts estimating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) between 21% and 25%. By 2030, the sector is expected to reach approximately $9 to $10 billion. The broader penetration testing industry is also expanding, with projections indicating it will surpass $5.3 billion by 2027, according to MarketandMarket.
To support enterprises and government entities across the Middle East, Turkey and Africa (META) with identifying and validating vulnerabilities and reducing security gaps in real-time, CyberKnight has partnered with Ridge Security, the World’s First Al-powered Offensive Security Validation Platform. Ridge Security’s products incorporate advanced artificial intelligence to deliver security validation through automated penetration testing and breach and attack simulations.
RidgeBot uses advanced AI to autonomously perform multi-vector iterative attacks, conduct continuous penetration testing, and validate vulnerabilities with zero false positives. RidgeBot has been deployed by customers worldwide as a key element of their journey to evolve from traditional vulnerability management to Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).
“Ridge Security’s core strength lies in delivering holistic, AI-driven security validation that enables organizations to proactively manage risk and improve operational performance,” said Hom Bahmanyar, Chief Enablement Officer at Ridge Security. “We are delighted to partner with CyberKnight to leverage their network of strategic partners, deep-rooted customer relations, and security expertise to accelerate our expansion plans in the region.”
“Our partnership with Ridge Security is a timely and strategic step, as 69% of organizations are now adopting AI-driven security for threat detection and prevention,” added Wael Jaber, Chief Strategy Officer at CyberKnight. “By joining forces, we enhance our ability to deliver automated, intelligent security validation solutions, reaffirming our commitment to empowering customers with resilient, future-ready cybersecurity across the region.”
-
GISEC1 week agoPositive Technologies @ GISEC Global 2025: Demonstrating Cutting-Edge Cyber Threats and AI Defense Strategies
-
Cyber Security1 week agoAxis Communications Sheds Light on Video Surveillance Industry Perspectives on AI
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: SANS Institute Weighs in on Deepfakes, Model Poisoning and Risk Frameworks at GISEC Global 2025
-
GISEC1 week agoManageEngine @ GISEC Global 2025: AI, Quantum Computing, and Ransomware Form Part of Cybersecurity Outlook for 2025
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: SentinelOne Speaks Hyperautomation, Purple AI, and the Future of Threat Detection at GISEC Global 2025
-
Africa Focus6 days agoCyberKnight Sets Up South Africa Entity
-
GISEC1 week agoGroup-IB @ GISEC Global 2025: Tackling Evolving Cyber Threats with Localised Intelligence and AI
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: CyberKnight on Zero Trust, AI, and Saudi Arabia’s Digital Transformation at GISEC Global 2025
