Expert Speak
The Growing Concern of Email Security Globally
In the modern digital era, cybercriminals are constantly evolving, using advanced methods to exploit weak points and trick the unsuspecting. Phishing attacks, where attackers impersonate trusted organizations to deceive individuals, are particularly rampant. These attacks can result in significant financial losses, data compromise, and damage to reputation. To counteract this threat, email security solutions like DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) have been developed.
A recent analysis by experts at SendLayer assessed the global landscape of email security across different sectors and regions. The results were concerning, highlighting a widespread lack of DMARC implementation, which leaves many at risk of phishing. This article will explore the primary insights from the study, pinpointing the sectors and regions most lacking in email security and stressing the urgency for enhanced protective measures.
Key Insights: A Glimpse into Global Email Security
Banking Domains at Risk
The research showed that even critical sectors like banking have alarmingly low DMARC adoption rates. 41% of global banking entities do not use DMARC, putting numerous customers in danger of financial scams via deceptive emails. Although the banking sector has better DMARC coverage than some others, it’s still insufficient. The ease with which scammers can mimic unprotected banking domains means customers could be duped into unauthorized transactions.
Other industries had even lower DMARC usage, with the graphic design sector at the lowest, where an astonishing 91% of domains had no DMARC safeguards. It’s imperative for all organizations to prioritize email security to maintain their credibility and the trust of their clientele.
Global Firms Overlooking Domain Safety
Of the major global corporations outside the Fortune 500, 66% had no DMARC safeguards. Even among those with DMARC, over half had a ‘none’ policy, making them susceptible to phishing attacks. This highlights a concerning disregard for stringent email security, which can have dire consequences for businesses.
Government Domains Widely Exposed
The research underscored the lacklustre approach of global government agencies in adopting DMARC. 65% of government domains across 198 nations lacked DMARC, making them prime targets for phishing. Given the inherent trust in government entities, individuals are more prone to be deceived by such emails. Of the government domains with DMARC, a worrying 36% had a ‘none’ policy, further risking citizens to email scams. This underscores the importance of governments mandating DMARC to fend off phishing and ensure citizen safety.
Fortune 500’s Varied Approach
While the Fortune 500 had commendable DMARC coverage at 88%, 12% still lacked it, exposing many to phishing threats. Additionally, 40% of these companies with DMARC opted for the ‘none’ policy, allowing potential impersonation by cyber criminals.
Oceania Firms Set the Standard
On the regional front, Oceania-based companies had the best DMARC adoption, followed by Europe, the Americas, Asia, and Africa. Notably, Denmark and the US-led individual nations in DMARC coverage. Yet, even the frontrunners had adoption rates around 59%, indicating a need for further action.
Conclusion: Prioritizing the Integrity of Email Security
Phishing remains a dominant cyber threat, inflicting damage on individuals, businesses, and governments. The study’s revelations about the gaps in DMARC usage are a wake-up call. Adopting DMARC and other comprehensive email security tools is crucial for entities across all sectors and geographies.
In our dynamic digital world, ensuring robust email security is a collective duty. By emphasizing email safety, we can work together to secure the future of digital interactions and shield individuals and entities from phishing threats.
Artificial Intelligence
How AI is Reinventing Cybersecurity for the Automotive Industry
Written by Alain Penel, VP of Middle East, CIS & Turkey at Fortinet (more…)
Cyber Security
Positive Technologies Study Reveals Successful Cyberattacks Nett 5X Profits
Positive Technologies has released a study on the dark web market, analysing prices for illegal cybersecurity services and products, as well as the costs incurred by cybercriminals to carry out attacks. The most expensive type of malware is ransomware, with a median cost of $7,500. Zero-day exploits are particularly valuable, often being sold for millions of dollars. However, the net profit from a successful cyberattack can be five times the cost of organizing it.
Experts estimate that performing a popular phishing attack involving ransomware costs novice cybercriminals at least $20,000. First, hackers rent dedicated servers, subscribe to VPN services, and acquire other tools to build a secure and anonymous IT infrastructure to manage the attack. Attackers also need to acquire the source code of malicious software or subscribe to ready-to-use malware, as well as tools for infiltrating the victim’s system and evading detection by security measures. Moreover, cybercriminals can consult with seasoned experts, purchase access to targeted infrastructures and company data, and escalate privileges within a compromised system. Products and tools are readily available for purchase on the dark web, catering to beginners. The darknet also offers leaked malware along with detailed instructions, making it easier for novice cybercriminals to carry out attacks.
Malware is one of the primary tools in a hacker’s arsenal, with 53% of malware-related ads focused on sales. In 19% of all posts, infostealers designed to steal data are offered. Crypters and code obfuscation tools, used to help attackers hide malware from security tools, are featured in 17% of cases. Additionally, loaders are mentioned in 16% of ads. The median cost of these types of malware stands at $400, $70, and $500, respectively. The most expensive malware is ransomware: its median cost is $7,500, with some offers reaching up to $320,000. Ransomware is primarily distributed through affiliate programs, known as Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS), where participants in an attack typically receive 70–90% of the ransom. To become a partner, a criminal must make a contribution of 0.05 Bitcoin (approximately $5,000) and have a solid reputation on the dark web.
Another popular attack tool is exploits: 69% of exploit-related ads focus on sales, with zero-day vulnerability posts accounting for 32% of them. In 31% of cases, the cost of exploits exceeds $20,000 and can reach several million dollars. Access to corporate networks is relatively inexpensive, with 72% of such ads focused on sales, and 62% of them priced at under a thousand dollars. Among cybercriminal services, hacks are the most popular option, accounting for 49% of reports. For example, the price for compromising a personal email account starts at $100, while the cost for a corporate account begins at $200.
Dmitry Streltsov, Threat Analyst at Positive Technologies, says, “On dark web marketplaces, prices are typically determined in one of two ways: either sellers set a fixed price, or auctions are held. Auctions are often used for exclusive items, such as zero-day exploits. The platforms facilitating these deals also generate revenue, often through their own escrow services, which hold the buyer’s funds temporarily until the product or service is confirmed as delivered. On many platforms, these escrow services are managed by either administrators or trusted users with strong reputations. In return, they earn at least 4% of the transaction amount, with the forums setting the rates.”
Considering the cost of tools and services on the dark web, along with the median ransom amount, cybercriminals can achieve a net profit of $100,000–$130,000 from a successful attack—five times the cost of their preparation. For a company, such an incident can result not only in ransom costs but also in massive financial losses due to disrupted business processes. For example, in 2024, due to a ransomware attack, servers of CDK Global were down for two weeks. The company paid cybercriminals $25 million, while the financial losses of dealers due to system downtime exceeded $600 million.
Expert Speak
What the Bybit Hack Reveals About the Future of Crypto Security
Written by Oded Vanunu, Chief Technologist & Head of Product Vulnerability Research at Check Point (more…)
-
GISEC1 week agoPositive Technologies @ GISEC Global 2025: Demonstrating Cutting-Edge Cyber Threats and AI Defense Strategies
-
Cyber Security1 week agoAxis Communications Sheds Light on Video Surveillance Industry Perspectives on AI
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: SANS Institute Weighs in on Deepfakes, Model Poisoning and Risk Frameworks at GISEC Global 2025
-
GISEC1 week agoManageEngine @ GISEC Global 2025: AI, Quantum Computing, and Ransomware Form Part of Cybersecurity Outlook for 2025
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: SentinelOne Speaks Hyperautomation, Purple AI, and the Future of Threat Detection at GISEC Global 2025
-
Africa Focus6 days agoCyberKnight Sets Up South Africa Entity
-
GISEC1 week agoGroup-IB @ GISEC Global 2025: Tackling Evolving Cyber Threats with Localised Intelligence and AI
-
GISEC1 week agoVideo: CyberKnight on Zero Trust, AI, and Saudi Arabia’s Digital Transformation at GISEC Global 2025


